Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:License review needed

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:License review needed

Possible violation of COM:FOP#Iraq.

MCMLXXXIX 15:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: If you see the Permission part in the these pages, you will find an Explanation about the permission of the Tasnim News Agency which states in its footer, and Per this Discussion "All Content by Tasnim News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License" and these cases have nothing to do with COM:FOP#Iraq.Thanks.--Mbazri (talk) 12:58, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I find it very hard to believe that Tasmin News Agency would be the artist of the depicted artwork. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nuevo mapa turístico accesible de Madrid

These files include maps, printed works, and software which was made available by the City of Madrid, but was likely produced by a third party with unknown copyright status.

Guanaco (talk) 03:31, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No, the material was provided by the City of Madrid (...el Ayuntamiento, a través del Área de Turismo de Madrid Destino), so that the license is, in this case, perfectly valid. --Discasto _talk 20:41, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I follow here Discasto. The depicted material was apparently created by the tourist office of Madrid as claimed. Per COM:PRP we need significant doubt which has not been substantiated. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:05, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mercamadrid

The City of Madrid is a major shareholder of Mercamadrid, but they are not the same entity, and it's unlikely that the city can simply license Mercamadrid materials without specific permission.

Guanaco (talk) 08:19, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As uploader. --Discasto _talk 20:41, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:12, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:License review needed

No evidence of permission. Original blog post has since been removed, but I couldn't seem to find any evidence of a free license in the archived version.

Yeeno (talk) 22:52, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 17:09, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]