Commons:Deletion requests/File:Japanese Sapporo Ichiban Sio Ramen.JPG
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Unauthorized derivative work of product/packaging Acather96 (talk) 13:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Keep by the analogous application of this judgment of hte Supreme Court of Japan. Takabeg (talk) 06:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)- KeepThere is no copyright in a package(except a thing of art),This product is not registered Design right,ja:意匠権,only Trademark registered.(IPDL)It is a judicial precedent of the packaging design of Japanese oolong tea. Please refer to it.(Japanese site)[1],[2],[3]--7'o'7 (talk) 20:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The previous deletion request seems to have been closed under the reason that it was a product design with no copyright protection applicable. I am not sure if it was really an informed decision. The cited judgements there were, in my understanding, about product designs composed of text and simple shapes, not much like the one nominated here with photographs. To my eyes, the photograph located in the center of this package is an independent (non de-minimis) artwork, making this file is a derivative work published without necessary permission. whym (talk) 07:55, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete copyvio as photography work. --Vantey (talk) 00:36, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
